Kerc Solar Tariff Order

080 22268675 677 fax.

Kerc solar tariff order.

080 22268667 22370214 click here for google map. 18th may 2018 present. Manival raju in the matter of.

Generic tariff order for solar pv plants ground mounted and solar rooftop photovoltaic units for fyi 9 karnataka electricity regulatory commission no 16 c 1 miller tank bed area vasanthanagara bengaluru 52 dated. The government of karnataka under its solar policy 2014 21 has set a target of 2400 mw for grid connected rooftop generation projects to be achieved by march 2021 the order said. The government of karnataka has set a target of 2400 mw of grid connected rooftop generation projects under its solar policy 2014 2021. Karnataka solar power development corporation solar energy corporation of india ltd.

The karnataka electricity regulatory commission has declared that the cancellation of a power purchase agreement ppa between the bangalore electricity supply company bescom and a rooftop solar project operator was valid and prescribed a reduced tariff for the project following a delay in implementation the kerc received a petition asking it to set aside a notice issued by bescom canceling. 16 c 1 millers tank bed area vasanth nagar bengaluru 560 052 karnataka india e mail. Legal bodies supreme court high court of karnataka appellate tribunal of electricity international organizations national association of regulatory utility commissioners. The kerc order pays lip service to the importance of renewable energy but its content in fact discourages it industry insiders said.

Tariff order for solar rooftop and small photovoltaic power plants fy17 fy18 karnataka electricity regulatory commission page 7 the tariff as per the commission s order dated 10th october 2013 shall be applicable. The karnataka electricity regulatory commission issued an order in favor of the bangalore electricity supply company limited and asked applied solar technologies private limited to revise its rooftop solar tariff to 5 20 0 07 kwh from the 9 56 0 13 kwh tariff it claimed the commission also noted that the developer was not entitled to any relief sought in the petition.